Fluoroscopic vs. Ultrasound for Knee Osteoarthritis Treatment
90
about 3.9 years
35–99
2 sites in CA, NY
What this study is about
This trial is testing whether fluoroscopy or ultrasound guidance is better for a procedure called cooled radiofrequency ablation (cRFA) of the knee geniculate nerves in people with osteoarthritis. The goal is to see if one method provides more accurate targeting and, therefore, potentially better results compared to the other.
Simplified from trial records by PatientMatch.
What you may be asked to do
- 1.Undergo cRFA
Participation Burden
What's physically and logistically required of participants.
Requires travel to a study site
How treatment is administered
You may get a placebo/standard care, and you won't know which.
Extracted study details
Pulled from the trial record to show what is being tested and what the study is measuring.
Primary: Numeric Pain Rating Scale, PROMIS - Depression, PROMIS - Pain Interference
Secondary: Six Minute Walk Test
Musculoskeletal